Everything is getting faster. Tools, feedback, delivery, expectations. And yet, the feeling of control is shrinking.

This newsletter is written for you—the one trying to keep up without losing clarity, judgment, or long-term stability. The tension isn’t about whether speed is good or bad. It’s about what happens when different parts of a system start moving at different tempos.

What follows is not a warning against progress. It’s a guide to understanding why acceleration often feels productive at first—and fragile later.

Work is often described as a straight path: plan → build → review → ship. In reality, it is a network of loops.

Coding loops. Support loops. Learning loops. Documentation loops. Coordination loops. Growth loops. Each runs at a different speed, with different goals and different feedback rhythms.

The best HR advice comes from people who’ve been in the trenches.

That’s what this newsletter delivers.

I Hate it Here is your insider’s guide to surviving and thriving in HR, from someone who’s been there. It’s not about theory or buzzwords — it’s about practical, real-world advice for navigating everything from tricky managers to messy policies.

Every newsletter is written by Hebba Youssef — a Chief People Officer who’s seen it all and is here to share what actually works (and what doesn’t). We’re talking real talk, real strategies, and real support — all with a side of humor to keep you sane.

Because HR shouldn’t feel like a thankless job. And you shouldn’t feel alone in it.

Sign Up Free

Some activities run within multiple loops simultaneously. A single code review, for example, is not just about correctness. It also spreads knowledge, reinforces norms, surfaces operational risks, and shapes future decisions.

When one loop accelerates, it doesn’t travel alone. It pulls tension across every loop it touches.

This is why speeding up one step often fails to deliver the promised overall improvement.

Tip: When improving any task, ask: “Which other loops depend on this step?”

Automation, tooling, and process optimization shrink local delays. Formatting disappears. Testing accelerates. Deployment shortens. Output increases.

Then something unexpected happens: the system still feels slow.

Not because work is slow—but because understanding, alignment, and confidence did not accelerate at the same rate.

Code can be written faster than its consequences can be understood. Decisions can be shipped faster than their risks can surface. Architecture can evolve faster than shared mental models can keep up.

This creates a cognitive bottleneck. Not in machines—but in people.

And that bottleneck quietly migrates instead of disappearing.

Tip: Track not just delivery time, but comprehension time: how long it takes others to truly understand what changed.

Desynchronization happens when loops that once informed each other drift apart.

Operations learns one reality. Development learns from others. Norms evolve in one place while behavior changes elsewhere. The system still functions—but with growing internal misalignment.

At first, nothing breaks. Then the fixes start repeating. Knowledge stops flowing. Surprises increase.

Eventually, an incident forces everything back into alignment at once. Roadmaps pause. Silos collapse temporarily. Everyone updates their understanding in a hurry.

Incidents feel sudden. In truth, they are a form of delayed synchronization.

They are not only failures—they are repairs.

Tip: Treat recurring incidents as signals of drifting loops, not just technical defects.

It's peak season, so volume's about to spike. Most teams either hire temps (expensive) or burn out their people (worse). See what smarter teams do: let AI handle predictable volume so your humans stay great.

Check your options

Not all slowness is waste.

Some loops must remain slow because they carry long-term stability: architecture, norms, trust, and shared understanding. These loops provide the foundation that fast loops rely on.

Short loops optimize output. Long loops protect coherence.

When long loops are rushed, systems run faster but lose memory. When short loops are over-constrained, systems gain safety and lose adaptability.

The skill is not choosing fast or slow.

The skill is choosing where each belongs.

Tip: If a decision is hard to reverse, protect it with longer feedback cycles.

Imagine this. You open your phone to an alert. It says, “you spent $236,000,000 more this month than you did last month.”

If you were the top bidder at Sotheby’s fall auctions, it could be reality.

Sounds crazy, right? But when the ultra-wealthy spend staggering amounts on blue-chip art, it’s not just for decoration.

The scarcity of these treasured artworks has helped drive their prices, in exceptional cases, to thin-air heights, without moving in lockstep with other asset classes.

The contemporary and post war segments have even outpaced the S&P 500 overall since 1995.*

Now, over 70,000 people have invested $1.2 billion+ across 500 iconic artworks featuring Banksy, Basquiat, Picasso, and more.

How? You don’t need Medici money to invest in multimillion dollar artworks with Masterworks.

Thousands of members have gotten annualized net returns like 14.6%, 17.6%, and 17.8% from 26 sales to date.

Explore offerings

_{*Based on Masterworks data. Past performance is not indicative of future returns. Important Reg A disclosures: masterworks.com/cd}

Productivity is not the sum of faster tasks. It is the harmony of interacting loops.

Optimizing one loop in isolation can feel like progress while quietly weakening the system that supports it. Over time, that weakness shows up as more coordination work, more rework, and more invisible labor.

Acceleration feeds itself. Faster tools raise expectations. Higher expectations demand more speed. And speed erodes the very structures that once made speed safe.

The solution is not to stop accelerating.

It is to accelerate with awareness.

Sometimes, slowing one part of the system allows everything else to move faster.

Tip: After any major acceleration effort, ask: “Which loop is now struggling to keep up?”

Speed is not the enemy.

Blind speed is.

Systems do not break because they move fast. They break when their parts stop moving together.

And the quiet advantage belongs to those who can sense when to accelerate—and when to protect the rhythm that keeps everything aligned.

That is how progress stays sustainable.

What’s your next spark? A new platform engineering skill? A bold pitch? A team ready to rise? Share your ideas or challenges at Tiny Big Spark. Let’s build your pyramid—together.

That’s it!

Keep innovating and stay inspired!

If you think your colleagues and friends would find this content valuable, we’d love it if you shared our newsletter with them!

As the world becomes increasingly digital, this question will be on the minds of millions of people seeking new income streams in 2026.

The answer is—Absolutely!

Thank you for taking the time to read today’s email! Your support allows me to send out this newsletter for free every day. 

 What do you think for today’s episode? Please provide your feedback in the poll below.

Share the newsletter with your friends and colleagues if you find it valuable.

Disclaimer: The "Tiny Big Spark" newsletter is for informational and educational purposes only, not a substitute for professional advice, including financial, legal, medical, or technical. We strive for accuracy but make no guarantees about the completeness or reliability of the information provided. Any reliance on this information is at your own risk. The views expressed are those of the authors and do not reflect any organization's official position. This newsletter may link to external sites we don't control; we do not endorse their content. We are not liable for any losses or damages from using this information.