In partnership with
How Clarity Emerges in a World That Won’t Sit Still
There’s a familiar feeling you might recognize: work keeps moving, decisions keep stacking up, and yet clarity feels just out of reach. Not because effort is lacking—but because everything seems tangled together in ways no slide deck ever prepared you for.
Most modern work isn’t failing due to a lack of plans. It’s struggling because the relationships between things are left unnamed, assumed, or oversimplified. When relationships stay vague, confusion spreads quietly. People disagree without realizing they’re operating from different mental models. Progress slows not from resistance, but from misalignment no one can quite articulate.
Here’s the quiet truth: labeling relationships changes how thinking works. It forces assumptions into the open. It reveals where expectations differ. And it shows why two smart people can look at the same situation and reach opposite conclusions—both of them logical.
Shoppers are adding to cart for the holidays
Over the next year, Roku predicts that 100% of the streaming audience will see ads. For growth marketers in 2026, CTV will remain an important “safe space” as AI creates widespread disruption in the search and social channels. Plus, easier access to self-serve CTV ad buying tools and targeting options will lead to a surge in locally-targeted streaming campaigns.
Read our guide to find out why growth marketers should make sure CTV is part of their 2026 media mix.
Too often, work systems rely on a small set of structures: hierarchies, boxes, ownership charts. These are comforting. They look clean. But they hide how work actually moves—through influence, interpretation, learning, feedback, and belief.
When relationships aren’t explicit, scale magnifies the problem. What works in a small group begins to fracture as more people rely on the same vague language to mean different things.
Practical Tip: When something feels “stuck,” don’t ask what’s missing. Ask how the pieces are assumed to relate—and whether everyone agrees on those assumptions.
The Hidden Power of How Goals and Work Relate
Not all goals mean the same thing. Not all efforts aim at outcomes in the same way. And yet, organizations often behave as if they do.
There are at least four distinct ways goals and initiatives tend to relate—each with radically different consequences:
Sometimes goals are the anchor, and initiatives are deliberate bets meant to influence them.
Sometimes initiatives come first, and goals are reverse-engineered to justify momentum already underway.
Sometimes goals act as guardrails—constraints rather than destinations.
Sometimes goals are nothing more than reporting buckets that summarize activity after the fact.
Each model sounds reasonable. None is interchangeable.
The danger isn’t choosing the “wrong” model. The danger is pretending there’s only one. Small shifts in how these relationships are understood can change how success is measured, how teams prioritize, and how learning happens.
When people talk past each other about “alignment,” this is often why. One person thinks goals are directional. Another treats them as descriptive. Both are acting rationally—within their own mental model.
Practical Tip: Before debating priorities, clarify the role goals are expected to play. Are they targets, filters, constraints, or summaries? Agreement here prevents downstream confusion.
AI-native CRM
“When I first opened Attio, I instantly got the feeling this was the next generation of CRM.”
— Margaret Shen, Head of GTM at Modal
Attio is the AI-native CRM for modern teams. With automatic enrichment, call intelligence, AI agents, flexible workflows and more, Attio works for any business and only takes minutes to set up.
Join industry leaders like Granola, Taskrabbit, Flatfile and more.
Two Worldviews Hiding in Plain Sight
Look closely at how strategy turns into action, and a deeper divide appears—not in structure, but in belief.
One worldview assumes the world is predictable enough to be broken into stable layers. Strategy sits at the top. Execution flows downward. Teams implement clearly defined intent. Progress comes from decomposition.
Another worldview assumes uncertainty is the default. Strategy emerges through learning. Work is framed as bets, not guarantees. Teams don’t just execute—they interpret, adapt, and contribute insight back into the system.
The difference isn’t cosmetic. It shapes how people think about responsibility, creativity, and risk.
In the first worldview, clarity is designed upfront. In the second, clarity is discovered over time.
One emphasizes capabilities and features. The other emphasizes beliefs, insights, and feedback loops. One favors coordination across large efforts. The other avoids those efforts whenever possible by learning quickly.
Neither is universally “better.” Each reflects assumptions about how reality behaves.
Practical Tip: Notice which worldview dominates. When friction appears, ask whether the system expects certainty while operating in uncertainty—or vice versa.
Banish bad ads for good
Google AdSense's Auto ads lets you designate ad-free zones, giving you full control over your site’s layout and ensuring a seamless experience for your visitors. You decide what matters to your users and maintain your site's aesthetic. Google AdSense helps you balance earning with user experience, making it the better way to earn.
Why Scaling Familiar Practices Quietly Breaks Them
Many well-intentioned frameworks were born from a simple idea: if something works for a small group, it should work for a bigger one.
That logic feels sound. It’s also where things start to unravel.
Some practices scale smoothly. Others change shape entirely when distance, politics, and interpretation enter the picture.
Small conversations become time-consuming coordination rituals.
Visual tools meant to improve flow become symbols of power or comparison.
Goal-setting methods designed for learning turn into translation exercises.
What looked like alignment becomes a telephone game. Meaning drifts. Context evaporates. People comply without understanding.
This isn’t a failure of discipline—it’s a failure of dynamics. Surface patterns repeat, but underlying forces do not.
Some systems grow more efficient with scale. Others grow more fragile, costly, and political. Treating them the same way creates invisible friction that no process tweak can fix.
Practical Tip: When scaling a practice, don’t ask “How do we roll this up?” Ask “Which dynamics change at this size—and which ones don’t?”
Costco’s Best-Kept Secrets: 10 Weird Tricks Only Superfans Know
Do you shop at Costco? Then you know the thrill of saving money. But you might be missing other smart ways to stretch your dollars. Check out our list of genius money hacks—almost as good as that $1.50 hot dog!
Learn More
Seeing the System as It Really Is
Real operating systems aren’t tidy trees. They’re living networks.
They include rituals, artifacts, decisions, beliefs, feedback loops, and people—all connected through relationships that do work: influencing, grounding, revealing, escalating, shaping expectations.
When these relationships are made visible, something interesting happens. Hierarchies fade into the background. What emerges instead is a mechanism-rich network that reflects how work actually flows.
When people are given the freedom to model systems openly, they rarely default to simple “part of” structures. Most relationships describe movement, meaning, and learning. This mirrors reality far better than any clean roll-up ever could.
Clarity doesn’t come from forcing messiness into neat boxes. It comes from naming how things truly interact.
For someone carrying a full cognitive load—decisions, trade-offs, constant change—this approach offers relief. Not by simplifying reality, but by making it legible.
Practical Tip: Sketch how work really happens. Use verbs, not just boxes. Label relationships explicitly. The insight comes from the connections, not the structure.
Final Thought
The world doesn’t operate as a clean hierarchy—and neither does meaningful work. When relationships are named, assumptions surface. When assumptions surface, alignment becomes possible. And when alignment becomes possible, complexity stops feeling overwhelming and starts feeling navigable.
Not because everything is under control—but because it finally makes sense.
What’s your next spark? A new platform engineering skill? A bold pitch? A team ready to rise? Share your ideas or challenges at Tiny Big Spark. Let’s build your pyramid—together.
That’s it!
Keep innovating and stay inspired!
If you think your colleagues and friends would find this content valuable, we’d love it if you shared our newsletter with them!
PROMO CONTENT
Can email newsletters make money?
As the world becomes increasingly digital, this question will be on the minds of millions of people seeking new income streams in 2026.
The answer is—Absolutely!
That’s it for this episode!
Thank you for taking the time to read today’s email! Your support allows me to send out this newsletter for free every day.
What do you think for today’s episode? Please provide your feedback in the poll below.
How would you rate today's newsletter?
Share the newsletter with your friends and colleagues if you find it valuable.
Disclaimer: The "Tiny Big Spark" newsletter is for informational and educational purposes only, not a substitute for professional advice, including financial, legal, medical, or technical. We strive for accuracy but make no guarantees about the completeness or reliability of the information provided. Any reliance on this information is at your own risk. The views expressed are those of the authors and do not reflect any organization's official position. This newsletter may link to external sites we don't control; we do not endorse their content. We are not liable for any losses or damages from using this information.