Crush System Design Interviews: Master Trade-Offs for Success

What We’ve Learned: Tackling System Design with Confidence and Clarity

Where It All Began – Understanding the Interview Landscape

Hi everyone, we’ve been reflecting a lot lately on system design interviews—why they matter, why they’re intimidating, and what we’ve learned from watching others succeed (and struggle) through them. A lot of our thoughts were sparked after reading and watching content by Sahn, who posted some incredibly helpful strategies on LinkedIn and YouTube through ByteByteGo. His breakdown of how system design interviews are structured—and more importantly, how to prepare for them—really resonated with us.

System design interviews are, in essence, simulations. They aren’t perfect representations of real-world engineering, but they serve a purpose: to get a signal on your ability to think in systems, communicate clearly, and make intentional design choices. And that’s no easy task when you’re handed a prompt like “Design Instagram” and a whiteboard with 45 minutes to go.

For us, it became clear that the real challenge isn’t about knowing everything—it’s about knowing how to structure your thoughts, where to focus, and how to communicate under pressure. It’s a thinking game as much as a technical one.

SPONSORS

Unlock AI-powered productivity

HoneyBook is how independent businesses attract leads, manage clients, book meetings, sign contracts, and get paid.

Plus, HoneyBook’s AI tools summarize project details, generate email drafts, take meeting notes, predict high-value leads, and more.

Think of HoneyBook as your behind-the-scenes business partner—here to handle the admin work you need to do, so you can focus on the creative work you want to do.

Try HoneyBook for free

Practice Isn’t Just Helpful—It’s the Only Way

From Sahn’s video and our own experiences watching peers grow into more confident system designers, one theme stood out: you have to build the muscle.

This doesn’t mean just reading system design books or memorizing architectures. It means picking a real-world app—like Uber, Twitter, or YouTube—and drawing the architecture yourself. On paper. Without help. Ask yourself: what services do I need? What should be cached? Where’s the bottleneck? How does data flow from the client to the storage layer?

We realized how powerful it is to sketch these out. It's not just practice; it's reflection. You begin to internalize trade-offs between consistency and availability, between latency and throughput. And you start seeing design questions not as puzzles to be solved perfectly, but as scenarios to navigate with constraints in mind.

We also loved how Sahn emphasized diagramming as a skill. Being able to show what you're thinking—and explain it while you go—is part of what separates someone who knows the answer from someone who can lead the conversation.

Fact-based news without bias awaits. Make 1440 your choice today.

Overwhelmed by biased news? Cut through the clutter and get straight facts with your daily 1440 digest. From politics to sports, join millions who start their day informed.

Sign up now!

Design is Trade-Offs—Not Tricks

As we dug deeper into system design principles, a second piece from ByteByteGo struck a chord. Titled System Design Was HARD—Until You Knew the Trade-Offs (Part 2), it explored the trade-offs behind many core architecture decisions. That content reminded us: there are no “right” answers—only better fits for the current needs and constraints.

Take scaling, for example. Vertical scaling sounds easy—just give your servers more power—but it runs into physical and financial limits fast. Horizontal scaling, while more flexible and resilient, adds serious complexity: load balancers, distributed state, and potential for data inconsistency.

Another fascinating example was REST vs. GraphQL. REST is predictable, time-tested, and straightforward. But when front-end teams need more control or are tired of making five calls for one screen, GraphQL shines. Yet GraphQL introduces performance and security challenges. So, again, it’s a question of fit—not of better.

And caching? The elegance of read-through caching feels great—until you hit issues with stale data. Suddenly, the choice between freshness and performance becomes a strategic decision, not a technical default.

Each of these trade-offs opened our eyes to the kind of thinking strong engineers and architects bring to their work. It’s not about always choosing the “best” component. It’s about asking: what’s best right now, with what we have, and what we’re solving for?

The Interview Mindset—And How to Practice It

If we’ve learned anything, it’s that great system design interview performance is never accidental.

There’s a cadence to approaching these questions. Sahn offered a great structure: begin with clarifying the problem, identifying core use cases, and narrowing the scope. Don’t jump into features—ask questions. What are the scale requirements? Are we optimizing for write-heavy or read-heavy use? What’s our latency tolerance?

From there, it’s about drawing a high-level architecture and breaking it down—storage, caching, queues, APIs, data flows. Throughout, narrate your thinking. Be transparent about trade-offs. Interviewers aren’t looking for a silver bullet—they’re looking to see if you think deeply and adaptively.

One thing we took to heart was practicing mock interviews. There’s no replacement for simulating the real thing: short on time, on the spot, and needing to explain your decisions clearly. And when feedback rolls in, we try to focus less on being “right” and more on being understood. That’s what moves the needle.

Where We're Going From Here

We’re still on this journey, but we’ve come a long way thanks to the insights from ByteByteGo and from watching peers put these principles into action.

If we could share one message with anyone preparing for system design interviews, it’s this: don’t obsess over being perfect. Focus on becoming deliberate.

Practice often. Choose a design problem and map it out. Talk through trade-offs with a friend. Record yourself walking through a diagram. Do it again tomorrow. Reflect. Build that thinking muscle.

Also, we’ve started to appreciate system design not just as a skill for interviews—but as a mindset for working on real systems. These trade-offs don’t end when you get the job. They define how we build. How we collaborate. How we scale.

Here’s to building better systems—together.

That’s it!

Keep innovating and stay inspired!

If you think your colleagues and friends would find this content valuable, we’d love it if you shared our newsletter with them!

PROMO CONTENT

Can email newsletters make money?

With the world becoming increasingly digital, this question will be on the minds of millions of people looking for new income streams in 2025.

The answer is—Absolutely!

That’s it for this episode!

Thank you for taking the time to read today’s email! Your support allows me to send out this newsletter for free every day. 

 What do you think for today’s episode? Please provide your feedback in the poll below.

Share the newsletter with your friends and colleagues if you find it valuable.

Disclaimer: The "Tiny Big Spark" newsletter is for informational and educational purposes only, not a substitute for professional advice, including financial, legal, medical, or technical. We strive for accuracy but make no guarantees about the completeness or reliability of the information provided. Any reliance on this information is at your own risk. The views expressed are those of the authors and do not reflect any organization's official position. This newsletter may link to external sites we don't control; we do not endorse their content. We are not liable for any losses or damages from using this information.