Cracking the Code: Ace Your System Design Interviews

Mastering System Design Interviews: Common Pitfalls and Practical Guidance

System design interviews remain one of the most critical hurdles for candidates aspiring to top tech positions. These interviews test not only technical expertise but also an individual’s ability to reason about complex, ambiguous problems under pressure. Many candidates, even those who are well-prepared, stumble on mistakes that are surprisingly avoidable.

A fundamental issue is starting a design without communication. In these interviews, the process matters as much as the solution. Consider a scenario where the task is to design a social media feed. Candidates often begin sketching systems silently, connecting components without any verbal explanation. This approach leaves the interviewer in the dark about the candidate’s reasoning, making it difficult to evaluate problem-solving abilities.

The key strategy is to think aloud. Explaining reasoning, weighing options, and actively engaging with the interviewer demonstrates not only technical competence but also collaboration skills. For instance, choosing between push-based feed generation (precomputing feeds) versus pull-based feed generation (on-demand computation) involves trade-offs. Push is faster for end-users but resource-intensive for highly popular accounts. Pull conserves resources but may slow down feed delivery. Discussing these nuances shows a deep understanding of system performance and resource management.

Tip: Always narrate design decisions, explain trade-offs, and invite feedback from the interviewer. Collaboration and clarity are as important as the design itself.

From Italy to a Nasdaq Reservation

How do you follow record-setting success? Get stronger. Take Pacaso. Their real estate co-ownership tech set records in Paris and London in 2024. No surprise. Coldwell Banker says 40% of wealthy Americans plan to buy abroad within a year. So adding 10+ new international destinations, including three in Italy, is big. They even reserved the Nasdaq ticker PCSO.

Invest for $2.90/Share

_{Paid advertisement for Pacaso’s Regulation A offering. Read the offering circular at invest.pacaso.com. Reserving a ticker symbol is not a guarantee that the company will go public. Listing on the NASDAQ is subject to approvals.}

Clarifying Requirements Before Designing

Another frequent mistake is designing without fully understanding requirements. Jumping into technical implementation without context can lead to a system that solves the wrong problem. A classic example is designing a URL shortener. Many candidates immediately list technical components—web servers, caches, load balancers—without asking essential questions.

Understanding requirements involves two layers: functional and non-functional. Functional questions include:

• Who will use the system? Internal teams or the public?

• What features are necessary? Custom URLs, analytics, expiration policies?

Non-functional questions address scale and performance:

• Expected number of requests per day?

• Read-to-write ratios?

• Latency and availability expectations?

Documenting assumptions clearly is equally important. If certain details are not provided, stating assumptions ensures transparency and shows comprehension of real-world engineering practices. Designing without these clarifications often results in overcomplicated or unsuitable systems.

Tip: Begin each design by asking about both functional and non-functional requirements. Write assumptions explicitly and confirm them with the interviewer. This demonstrates systematic thinking and reduces unnecessary complexity.

Is Your Amazon Strategy Actually Working?

Are you a fast-growing omni-channel brand? Do you know your Amazon profitability (and are you happy with it)?

At Cartograph, we’ve spent 7 years helping brands like OLIPOP, Starface, Rao’s, and 300+ brands in Food, Bev, Supplements, Beauty, Pet, and other categories scale profitably on Amazon.

No fluff. No bots. Click below for an Amazon audit from a real human with insights you can actually use.

Get an Amazon Audit

Start Big, Then Dive Into Details

Many candidates make the mistake of focusing on implementation details too early. For example, when designing a video streaming platform, discussions might immediately shift to video encoding formats, CDN placement, and compression algorithms. While these are important, premature focus on them can obscure the overall architecture.

The recommended approach is to start with high-level design:

1. Identify major components: upload service, processing pipeline, storage system, streaming delivery.

2. Define relationships and data flow: how content moves from creators to end-users.

3. Then dive into technical details and optimizations for individual components.

This approach demonstrates a systematic thought process and ensures the interviewer can follow the candidate’s reasoning. It also prevents technical minutiae from overshadowing architectural clarity.

Tip: Use diagrams or structured notes to communicate the flow from the user to the system and back. Always prioritize understanding the big picture before optimizing individual components.

Discuss Trade-offs Clearly

Technical choices in system design are rarely absolute. Every decision involves trade-offs, and failing to discuss these is a common pitfall. Consider designing a chat application: WebSockets offer real-time communication but require handling persistent connections and added complexity. HTTP polling is simpler and more firewall-friendly but less efficient.

Highlighting trade-offs demonstrates engineering judgment:

• Explain pros and cons of each approach.

• Suggest options suitable for the scenario.

• Provide a reasoned recommendation aligned with system requirements.

Similarly, scalability decisions must be proportional to the problem. Overengineering for small-scale systems—deploying microservices, sharding databases, and using multi-region architectures for low-volume applications—adds unnecessary complexity and risk.

Tip: Present multiple design alternatives and explain trade-offs explicitly. Recommend solutions that balance efficiency, simplicity, and scalability. Show that decision-making is informed and context-driven.

The Only AI That Knows All Your Work

Most AI tools start from scratch every time. ClickUp Brain already knows the answers.

It has full context of all your work—docs, tasks, chats, files, and more. No uploading. No explaining. No repetitive prompting.

It's not just another AI tool. It's the first AI that actually understands your workflow because it lives where your work happens.

Join 150,000+ teams and save 1 day per week.

Try ClickUp Brain Free.

Practical Guidance and Final Thoughts

System design interviews are ultimately about solving ambiguous problems effectively. There is rarely a perfect solution. The focus should be on:

• Understanding requirements thoroughly.

• Starting with a clear, high-level architecture.

• Communicating reasoning and trade-offs transparently.

• Scaling solutions appropriately, beginning simple and expanding as needed.

Practice can reinforce these patterns. Mock interviews, system design exercises, and reviewing common architectures—like feed systems, URL shorteners, video platforms, and chat applications—can build both confidence and intuition.

Practical Tips:

1. Think aloud: Ensure your reasoning is visible.

2. Ask questions: Clarify functional and non-functional requirements before designing.

3. Start simple: Avoid overengineering early; scale only when necessary.

4. Communicate trade-offs: Always explain pros and cons of technical decisions.

5. Engage the interviewer: Collaborate and seek feedback on design choices.

Mastering system design interviews requires a blend of technical skills, structured thinking, and communication. Candidates who balance these elements demonstrate the judgment and adaptability essential for senior engineering roles. Following these strategies improves the likelihood of success while also reinforcing real-world engineering best practices.

What’s your next spark? A new platform engineering skill? A bold pitch? A team ready to rise? Share your ideas or challenges at Tiny Big Spark. Let’s build your pyramid—together.

That’s it!

Keep innovating and stay inspired!

If you think your colleagues and friends would find this content valuable, we’d love it if you shared our newsletter with them!

PROMO CONTENT

Can email newsletters make money?

With the world becoming increasingly digital, this question will be on the minds of millions of people looking for new income streams in 2025.

The answer is—Absolutely!

That’s it for this episode!

Thank you for taking the time to read today’s email! Your support allows me to send out this newsletter for free every day. 

 What do you think for today’s episode? Please provide your feedback in the poll below.

Share the newsletter with your friends and colleagues if you find it valuable.

Disclaimer: The "Tiny Big Spark" newsletter is for informational and educational purposes only, not a substitute for professional advice, including financial, legal, medical, or technical. We strive for accuracy but make no guarantees about the completeness or reliability of the information provided. Any reliance on this information is at your own risk. The views expressed are those of the authors and do not reflect any organization's official position. This newsletter may link to external sites we don't control; we do not endorse their content. We are not liable for any losses or damages from using this information.