The Future of Engineering Management: A Balanced View

As we step into a world where technology is rapidly reshaping every industry, the conversation around replacing traditional roles—like that of engineering managers—with AI agents has become increasingly loud. Recently, a friend of mine, a seasoned entrepreneur who has seen his fair share of AI applications in action, posed a bold question: why not replace managers entirely with artificial intelligence? At first glance, the idea might seem far-fetched, but the implications deserve deeper thought.

The Rise of AI in Engineering Teams

Imagine a scenario where every engineering team operates under the guidance of an AI agent—let’s call it EMAI (Engineering Manager AI). EMAI isn’t just a chatbot or a simple algorithm; it’s been trained on vast amounts of historical engineering data, software project lifecycles, and management best practices. It understands allocating tasks based on an engineer’s strengths, workload, and preferences. It can even pick up on the emotional tone in a morning stand-up, offer conflict resolution through mediation, and even automate training and learning opportunities, adjusting to real-time tech trends. Sounds impressive, right?

On paper, this AI-driven approach could drastically improve productivity and efficiency. After all, AI doesn’t get fatigued, doesn’t succumb to office politics, and can process data at speeds humans can’t. It could allocate resources more accurately, foresee bottlenecks before they happen, and even negotiate with stakeholders to ensure smooth operations. Theoretically, it epitomizes efficiency—a managerial utopia driven by cold, complex data.

But Is It Enough?

Here’s where the cracks start to show. While AI excels at analyzing patterns, tracking performance, and making data-driven decisions, it lacks something fundamental: empathy. The most skilled engineering managers are more than just taskmasters—leaders, mentors, and understanding figures who listen to their teams, recognize individual struggles, and provide genuine emotional support. They create an environment where people feel safe, valued, and motivated—something AI cannot replicate.

Effective management is more than distributing work efficiently; it’s about understanding the why behind the work. Why did a particular developer seem disengaged during a project? What external factors might be affecting their performance? How do you balance short-term deadlines with long-term career growth? These complex questions require human intuition, emotional intelligence, and sometimes even gut feelings—qualities AI simply doesn’t possess, at least not yet.

As much as AI can crunch data and optimize task allocation, it can’t sense the mood in a room, feel the fatigue in a colleague’s eyes, or celebrate a team member’s personal wins with genuine joy. The human connection matters—especially in a high-stakes, high-pressure environment like engineering. It fosters trust, collaboration, and a sense of belonging, which are crucial for long-term innovation and success.

The Shortcomings of AI-Driven Management

There are also practical limitations to this approach. As sophisticated as they may seem, AI agents rely heavily on the data they’ve been trained on. What happens when faced with a situation that isn’t neatly categorized in its database? How does EMAI handle unforeseen variables, nuanced conversations, or unexpected cultural shifts? AI, at the end of the day, can be predictive, but not proactive in the way humans can be. It might solve immediate problems efficiently, but it struggles with understanding the deeper, context-rich realities of the workplace.

Moreover, the realm of engineering is far from uniform. Different teams have different dynamics, varied skill sets, and unique cultural backgrounds. AI might operate under a one-size-fits-all framework, but real teams thrive on tailored guidance, which comes from an understanding that’s grounded in shared experiences—something an algorithm cannot provide.

The Role of Human Leadership in Observability and Beyond

When we think about observability—the practice of tracking, monitoring, and diagnosing system performance—it becomes clear that human leadership plays a pivotal role here too. Engineering managers are crucial in ensuring that observability data is interpreted, contextualized, and acted upon in a way that aligns with both business goals and team well-being. While AI can collect and present data, it’s people who make sense of it, connecting the dots between metrics, logs, and actual user experiences.

A skilled engineering manager doesn’t just look at a spike in latency; they dive into the logs, track down the root cause, and bring in the right team to resolve it. They build bridges between development, testing, operations, and business units to ensure that observability efforts are comprehensive and effective. AI may guide these efforts, but it cannot fully replace the human oversight and intuition required to make sense of the interconnected systems we’re building.

Betting on Human-Powered Leadership

While the notion of AI managing engineering teams may sound appealing in theory, I’ve come to the conclusion that humans—specifically, engineering managers—are not something we can simply replace. Instead, I believe in enhancing the role of engineering managers with AI tools—technologies that can assist, automate, and augment their work, freeing up their time to focus on the things that matter most: building relationships, fostering growth, and guiding teams with empathy and strategy.

The best managers don’t just supervise; they inspire. They don’t just delegate tasks; they cultivate an environment where creativity flourishes. They don’t merely enforce deadlines; they align team objectives with meaningful work that drives both personal and professional satisfaction. AI agents can handle the administrative burdens and optimize the workflows, but they fall short of creating the human connection that fuels innovation.

I’m betting on the future of engineering managers—not as replaceable cogs in the machine, but as empowered leaders who will leverage technology to focus on what they do best: empowering their teams, guiding them through complex challenges, and building a work culture where people thrive. Technology should be a tool to enhance human potential, not replace it.

So, as we continue to navigate the rise of AI in the workplace, my stance remains clear: AI can play an essential role in making engineering teams more efficient, but human leadership—rooted in empathy, emotional intelligence, and strategic foresight—is here to stay. And in that intersection, I see the future of engineering management—one where AI and humans complement each other, driving teams to new heights.

Let's continue to build that future together, with both heart and mind.

Until we meet again, keep innovating and stay inspired!

If you enjoy this content, share it with your friends, teammates, and anyone aspiring to become a tech leader.

PROMO CONTENT

Can email newsletters make money?

With the world becoming increasingly digital, this question will be on the minds of millions of people looking for new income streams in 2025.

The answer is—Absolutely!

That’s it for this episode!

Thank you for taking the time to read today’s email! Your support allows me to send out this newsletter for free every day. 

 What do you think for today’s episode? Please provide your feedback in the poll below.

Share the newsletter with your friends and colleagues if you find it valuable.

Disclaimer: The "Tiny Big Spark" newsletter is for informational and educational purposes only, not a substitute for professional advice, including financial, legal, medical, or technical. We strive for accuracy but make no guarantees about the completeness or reliability of the information provided. Any reliance on this information is at your own risk. The views expressed are those of the authors and do not reflect any organization's official position. This newsletter may link to external sites we don't control; we do not endorse their content. We are not liable for any losses or damages from using this information.