AI is changing how organizations work, but the biggest leadership challenge is not learning another tool. It is learning how to lead through uncertainty, redesign how teams operate, and stay deeply connected to people while machines take on more of the routine work.

AI is changing software engineering, but the bigger transformation may be happening above the code.

When technology changes this quickly, leadership cannot remain the same. Organizations need people who can provide direction when the path is unclear, connect technical work to real purpose, understand how teams interact, and make thoughtful decisions when there is no obvious answer.

For you, that creates an important distinction: AI does not eliminate the need for leadership. It increases the value of exceptional leadership while making routine management easier to automate.

That is why adapting to AI is not simply about teaching people how to use AI. It is about changing how leaders think, how organizations are structured, and how work gets done.

For its first CTV campaign, Jennifer Aniston’s DTC haircare brand LolaVie had a few non-negotiables. The campaign had to be simple. It had to demonstrate measurable impact. And it had to be full-funnel.

LolaVie used Roku Ads Manager to test and optimize creatives — reaching millions of potential customers at all stages of their purchase journeys. Roku Ads Manager helped the brand convey LolaVie’s playful voice while helping drive omnichannel sales across both ecommerce and retail touchpoints.

The campaign included an Action Ad overlay that let viewers shop directly from their TVs by clicking OK on their Roku remote. This guided them to the website to buy LolaVie products.

Discover how Roku Ads Manager helped LolaVie drive big sales and customer growth with self-serve TV ads.

The DTC beauty category is crowded. To break through, Jennifer Aniston’s brand LolaVie, worked with Roku Ads Manager to easily set up, test, and optimize CTV ad creatives. The campaign helped drive a big lift in sales and customer growth, helping LolaVie break through in the crowded beauty category.

Learn more.

Transformational periods require transformational leadership.

The strongest leaders are not simply the people who can create a plan and make everyone follow it. They inspire people, define what excellence looks like, lead by example, connect everyday work to a larger purpose, and understand the human relationships that determine whether an organization actually works.

Those qualities become even more important when AI enters the picture.

Routine management is particularly vulnerable. Scheduling, bureaucracy, repetitive coordination, information gathering, and other nuts-and-bolts management activities can increasingly be supported or performed by AI. In some cases, AI can bring broader perspectives and fewer of the personal incentives and emotional baggage that influence human decision-making.

That does not mean leadership itself can be automated.

The difficult part of leadership has always been understanding people. And that is precisely where many technically successful managers have a blind spot.

Being an excellent engineer does not automatically mean understanding motivation, organizational behavior, relationships, perception, or how your own behavior affects other people. Simply having worked with many managers or survived organizational changes does not create deep expertise in human behavior.

That understanding requires deliberate practice, self-awareness, and often guidance from people who have studied human behavior more deeply.

Tip: Before trying to understand how everyone else should change for AI, examine how your own assumptions, behavior, communication, and decisions affect the people around you.

Leadership often rewards decisiveness.

People expect leaders to have answers, establish a direction, and move the organization forward. But AI creates situations where the answers are still emerging.

A strong leader needs to hold two seemingly conflicting abilities at once: the ability to act decisively and the ability to remain comfortable with uncertainty.

Too much uncertainty can become indecision. Too much certainty can close the organization off from better ideas.

The ability to remain engaged while a difficult problem is still being solved allows leaders to hear different perspectives, challenge their own assumptions, and help others navigate ambiguity without pretending everything is already understood.

That vulnerability can actually become part of leading by example.

You do not need to demonstrate that you have every answer. You need to demonstrate that difficult problems can be approached with curiosity, openness, urgency, and trust.

AI is already creating uncertainty about jobs, skills, organizational structures, and professional identity. Leaders experiencing that uncertainty themselves cannot simply hide it behind confident presentations.

Tip: When the answer is genuinely unknown, make the uncertainty visible while still providing direction on what the organization will do next.

One of the clearest leadership responsibilities in an AI-enabled organization is to walk the walk.

A leader cannot simply encourage employees to use AI while continuing to operate exactly as before.

Leadership itself should change.

Routine management work should increasingly be handled with AI where appropriate, creating more time for leaders to focus on people, difficult decisions, customers, technical problems, and the work that actually requires judgment.

This also has implications for organizational structure.

More management layers can slow information flow. AI may contribute to flatter organizations where exceptional leaders work more directly with engineers, customers, and the problems themselves rather than relying on layers of people to summarize what is happening.

The goal is not simply to have fewer managers.

The deeper goal is to have better leadership closer to the actual work.

And that distinction matters because AI can magnify whatever already exists inside an organization.

If communication is poor, AI can accelerate disconnected work. If teams operate in silos, AI can allow those silos to move faster. If priorities are unclear, AI can make it easier for teams to produce more work without necessarily producing more value.

Tip: Use AI on your own management workload first, then spend the time you recover on the people, customers, systems, and decisions that cannot be delegated so easily.

There is a subtle danger in AI adoption: local productivity can increase while organizational effectiveness gets worse.

When individuals and teams can build software much faster, they can also expand their own scope much faster. Teams may begin creating their own solutions, systems, and internal “kingdoms” without enough coordination with the rest of the organization.

This connects directly to Conway’s Law: the systems an organization builds tend to reflect the communication structures of the organization itself.

AI changes the speed at which those structures can produce things.

That means leadership has to actively shape how teams work together rather than assuming better tools will automatically produce a better organization.

A team writing software is not automatically evidence that the organization needs that software.

A useful leadership question is surprisingly simple:

Why does this problem exist in the first place?

That question becomes even more important when AI makes producing code dramatically easier.

If teams can create solutions almost instantly, the scarce resource is no longer simply the ability to build. It is the ability to decide what deserves to be built.

Tip: When AI makes a project unusually easy to build, slow down long enough to ask whether solving the underlying problem is actually the right priority.

AI also makes organizational design more important.

One recurring problem is creating small islands of software development under leaders who do not fully understand the systems they oversee. Another is separating teams from the operational consequences of what they build.

The stronger principle is straightforward: the person or team accountable for an outcome should also have the authority to make the decisions required to achieve it.

That means ownership cannot be separated from responsibility.

If one team owns the new generation of a platform while another team carries the operational burden of the current generation, important context can disappear. The people building the future may not experience the consequences of today's decisions.

Systems thinking becomes difficult when nobody owns the whole system.

AI makes this more important because development can happen faster and across more boundaries. Without clear ownership, speed can simply produce more disconnected pieces.

Tip: Look for places where responsibility sits with one group while decision-making authority sits somewhere else; those gaps are often where organizational problems become persistent.

Creators lock in holiday content calendars 90 days out, before brands figure out commissions. Waiting too long to launch an affiliate program means less runway to build demand and a missed shot at the best partnerships.

The 90-Day Holiday Sprint covers commissions, recruiting, and scaling a program at Day 30, 60, and 90.

Download the Free Guide

AI is unlikely to distribute capability evenly.

Instead, it can amplify the people who already have the breadth to use it effectively.

Consider a systems engineer who understands architecture, failure modes, business consequences, infrastructure economics, mathematics, communication, testing, security, deployment, and operations.

Give that person powerful AI tools and the technology becomes a multiplier.

The AI can generate simulations, explore alternatives, produce code, and accelerate experimentation. But the human still needs to understand what questions are worth asking and whether the answers make sense.

That is the important distinction.

AI can dramatically accelerate exploration, but experience and systems understanding determine whether that exploration produces something valuable.

The same principle applies to leadership.

A manager whose primary strength is administrative coordination may become less differentiated as AI takes over more routine work. A leader who can inspire people, understand systems, communicate clearly, work across disciplines, engage directly with customers and technical problems, and connect the work to a larger purpose becomes more valuable.

Tip: Build breadth alongside technical depth; understanding customers, economics, people, communication, operations, and technology gives AI more useful context to work with.

This is where the discussion becomes especially interesting for people earlier in their careers.

AI can dramatically accelerate learning and provide access to knowledge that previously took years to accumulate.

That does not mean experience suddenly becomes irrelevant.

It means the relationship between experience and capability is changing.

The most valuable future leaders may not simply be the people with the longest tenure or the highest position on today's organizational chart. They may be the people who can adapt quickly, communicate across disciplines, build relationships, mentor others, think in systems, and execute.

For engineers in particular, the career path may become broader much earlier.

Instead of staying narrowly focused on technical implementation, engineers can increasingly be expected to own projects, communicate with customers, understand business constraints, work with deadlines, and deal with the messy combination of technology, economics, people, and operations.

AI can help accelerate the technical side of that development.

But it cannot remove the need to develop judgment.

Tip: Don't define your growth only by the technologies you learn; deliberately seek exposure to customers, business decisions, operations, communication, and the human side of the work.

The old image of management is built around direct reports, meetings, roadmaps, business plans, status updates, and organizational coordination.

That model becomes less compelling when AI can increasingly handle routine information processing and administrative work.

The emerging model requires something deeper.

You need leaders who can write clearly, ask excellent questions, stay curious, make decisions from first principles, understand technical and human systems, and remain close enough to the work to understand what is actually happening.

They need to zoom out and understand the broader context without losing the conceptual integrity of the system they are responsible for.

And perhaps most importantly, they need to understand themselves.

Leadership is not simply about controlling a team.

It is about finding potential in people and processes and having the courage to develop it.

That requires a level of self-awareness and human understanding that becomes more important as AI takes more routine work away.

The biggest mistake would be to treat AI transformation as a technology rollout.

It is an organizational and human transformation.

You can introduce powerful tools and still have slow decision-making, fragmented teams, unnecessary projects, weak accountability, poor communication, and leaders who are disconnected from the actual work.

In fact, AI can make those problems harder to ignore because it allows organizations to move faster.

The challenge for leadership is therefore not simply to make everyone more productive.

It is to make sure the organization is moving in the right direction.

That means deliberately shaping teams, concentrating attention on the most valuable work, avoiding organizational pathologies, keeping authority and accountability together, staying connected to customers and engineers, and creating an environment where people can operate effectively through uncertainty.

The leaders who thrive in this environment will not necessarily be the people who know the most about AI.

They will be the people who know what to do with it.

Tip: Treat AI as a multiplier of leadership rather than a replacement for it; the quality of the organization, its decisions, and its people still determines where that multiplier takes you.

What’s your next spark? A new platform engineering skill? A bold pitch? A team ready to rise? Share your ideas or challenges at Tiny Big Spark. Let’s build your pyramid—together.

That’s it!

Keep innovating and stay inspired!

If you think your colleagues and friends would find this content valuable, we’d love it if you shared our newsletter with them!

As the world becomes increasingly digital, this question will be on the minds of millions of people seeking new income streams in 2026.

The answer is—Absolutely!

Thank you for taking the time to read today’s email! Your support allows me to send out this newsletter for free every day. 

 What do you think for today’s episode? Please provide your feedback in the poll below.

Share the newsletter with your friends and colleagues if you find it valuable.

Disclaimer: The "Tiny Big Spark" newsletter is for informational and educational purposes only, not a substitute for professional advice, including financial, legal, medical, or technical. We strive for accuracy but make no guarantees about the completeness or reliability of the information provided. Any reliance on this information is at your own risk. The views expressed are those of the authors and do not reflect any organization's official position. This newsletter may link to external sites we don't control; we do not endorse their content. We are not liable for any losses or damages from using this information.